
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 5 - Jul 10
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
1967-1969 F-Body 6L80 & 1968-1974 X-Body Crossmember RCF1-6L80Fits GM F and X Body Models: Camaro, Nova, Formula 400, Trans Am, Firebird, Ventura, Omega, Apollo, Chevy II. Fits Years: 67 69 F Body, 68 74 X Body This crossmember fits both SBC and BBC engines for the 67 69 F Body and 68 74 X Body. Fits Transmissions: 6L80E Slip Yoke, 6L90E Slip Yoke For a proper fit with these transmissions, the GMTM Transmission Mount and GF GMTM SP Shims are included. For the 1968 1974 frames, the distance between the
- Fits GM F and X-Body Models: Camaro, Nova, Formula 400, Trans Am, Firebird, Ventura, Omega, Apollo, Chevy II.
- Fits Years: 67-69 F Body, 68-74 X Body
- This crossmember fits both SBC and BBC engines for the 67-69 F-Body and 68-74 X-Body.
- Fits Transmissions: 6L80E Slip Yoke, 6L90E Slip Yoke
- For a proper fit with these transmissions, the GMTM Transmission Mount and GF-GMTM-SP Shims are included.
- For the 1968-1974 frames, the distance between the crossmember frame mounting holes is 30-3/8". To ensure proper crossmember selection be sure to measure your frame before you order.
Application:
| Year | Make | Model | Submodel |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1973-1974 | Buick | Apollo | |
| 1967-1969 | Chevrolet | Camaro | |
| 1968 | Chevrolet | Chevy II | |
| 1967-1969 | Pontiac | Firebird | |
| 1969-1974 | Chevrolet | Nova | |
| 1973-1974 | Oldsmobile | Omega | |
| 1971-1974 | Pontiac | Ventura |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 2025 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Check size guide before buying but a great dress!
Size: Medium, Color: Pink
Check size guide before ordering. Had to return for a larger size. Overall great quality, comfortable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 4, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Adorable but runs small
Size: Medium, Color: Black/Ivory, Size: Medium, Color: Black/Ivory
These are the cutest shirts- cotton, soft, thick- good quality but SMALL. Returned because of size and ordered a bigger size. I added a picture for reference- the other is a cotton 7-8 from Disney - I feel like the M /8 amazon was more a 6. I definitely recommend these shirts though just size up at least one size.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 20, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Good value, runs small
Size: X-Small, Color: Mauve/Butterflies
Runs small. Great shirts and value otherwise.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 17, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Gift for granddaughter
Size: Large, Color: Mauve/Butterflies
My granddaughter likes these tops. They are sturdy, comfortable and soft. She loves the ruffles on the shoulder. They were reasonably priced and I feel they will last. Look good after a number of washes.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 25, 2025
★★★★★ 3
Shrank after one wash
I wanted to love these but they shrank in the washer after one wear. Now they are above my daughters wrist, too small. They do feel good, and have a nice thickness. From initial unpackaging I expected we’d have these in rotation for a while. Looks and feels like a quality buy, until washing.
I’ll be saving them for a younger child but my intention was for the oldest. I’ve been trying out the Amazon Essentials brand clothing for kids. Seems to be hit or miss, haven’t come across anything I absolutely love.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 28, 2026